Tag Archives: viewpoints

The Next President: Oh, Hillary!

The first general election debate will be held tonight. The contest between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is stubbornly close with the two candidates polling neck and neck, according to today’s national averages reported by RealClearPolitics. Tonight, neither candidate will win, but it is difficult to see how Donald Trump can lose. His strategy is simple: help Clinton be a loser. Hillary Clinton, however, has an opportunity to do the unexpected: to distinguish herself by not cooperating with Donald Trump’s strategy and taking the wind (mostly hot air) out of his sails.

To be clear, the next chapter endorses Hillary Clinton. TNC has summarized the positions of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on six issues. The contrast is stark. TNC sides with Clinton on all six issues and disagrees with Trump on all six. But many voters–maybe a majority–do not care so much about “issues.” If Hillary Clinton spends most of her debate time on “issues,” she will have squandered her opportunity to show voters the person she is–instead of confirming Donald Trump’s characterization of her.

Hillary Clinton, in an address to the Laborers’ International Union of North America last week, asked: “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” It seems she cannot help herself. Her vulnerability is political tone-deafness. Either she is not being given good advice from those who are in a position to  influence her, or she is not listening to the good advice she is given. To help her escape from the quagmire, TNC will offer its own advice, for free.

She must be prepared for the “basket of deplorables” question that is bound to come up in the debate tonight. It is likely that she will be asked if she wants to apologize for saying, at a fundraiser last Friday, “you can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables.” On Saturday, her walk-back of her “grossly generalistic” statement was…well, deplorable: “I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong.” What should she have said? Only forty-seven percent belong in the basket? Or maybe just ten percent? How many of those–again in her words–are “irredeemable” and “not America?”

No, she needs to own her original statements and give an unequivocal apology. If she would be president, she must be president of the whole country. She seems to believe in an inclusive America when it comes to immigrants, gays and Muslims. The principle of inclusiveness must also apply to those who disagree with her and to those whose ideas she finds deplorable. Let divisiveness and name-calling be Donald Trump’s tactics. A leader must be prepared to accept the goodness and humanity of all people–including members of Congress who may hold violently opposing ideas.

Hillary Clinton could completely flummox Donald Trump tonight by expressing acceptance of him and of all of his supporters. If she will not take TNC’s advice, perhaps she might heed the words in Matthew:

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

Share This:

Hits: 699

Some other stuff for later,

  • 86
    Neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton won the debate last night at Hofstra University in New York, but Clinton gave the better performance. Donald Trump played to his base. He seems incapable of appealing to voters who do not already support him. The same might be said of Hillary Clinton,…
  • 74
    The morning after the drama of former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8, our local newspaper editorialized that the “key question” was whether anything the president said to him amounted to obstruction of justice. While most of the questions from Republican members of…
  • 73
    The 2020 election is fifteen months away, and already the Democrats are intent on deciding how best to lose.  There is general agreement among the two dozen or so candidates that any one of them would be a far better president than the one we’ve got now.  Yet, their collective…

Bless Ed Bee

When I was growing up, a simple invitation to dinner at a friend’s house could set off a small wave of panic in my mind. The thing that terrified me was the possibility that, as the family settled at their dinner table, the presiding parent, mom or dad, would smile at me and suggest that I “ask the blessing.”

The “blessing” of food was not a ritual we practiced in my home. I would be astonished if my father called for a holding of hands at our table while he intoned a request to the Lord to “bless” our meatloaf. If we had any ritual at our dinner table, it would be my mother’s inquiry as to whether I had washed my hands before coming to the table. I became pretty devout about hand-washing at dinner time, but I never learned the appropriate words to “ask the blessing.”

On those unavoidable occasions when I sat cornered at an unfamiliar dinner table, invited to “ask the blessing” and feeling the expectant and hungry eyes of my friend’s family focused on me, I must have stammered out a few disjointed phrases seeking the “blessing” of the food we were about to eat. Those were not my best moments, and I did not often dine at friends’ houses.

The whole business about blessing things baffles me to this day. In spite of my lack of comprehension, I am compelled to use the word in some situations. For example, if somebody sneezes nearby, I will say “bless you!” It is an automatic call and response reflex. It is good manners, but what does it mean? Why do we ask a higher power to “bless” the sneezer?

Which of the several dictionary definitions applies here? Are we asking for the sneezer to be “consecrated” or “made holy?” Does the sneeze call for us to “feel gratitude toward” the sneezer or to “seek divine favor” for the sneezer? Do we seek “approval” for the sneezing? Do we call for the sneezer to be “favored,” “endowed,” “congratulated,” “gladdened” or otherwise “glorified” for sneezing?

I am baffled by blessing, whether in the sneezing context or in many other common blessing situations. For example, it has been suggested that I “count my blessings.” Here, I suppose it is meant that I take account of those good things that life has given me. I should be thankful for my health, for my family and friendships, for my abilities and my accomplishments. Whatever counts as a “blessing” should be counted. I don’t know why the number of blessings should be important to me.

And then there is the expression “God bless.” It is an expression commonly used by politicians at the conclusion of a speech, as in “God bless the United States of America!” It is a blatant supplication to a higher power to grant our nation special favor or holy protection. This overt manifestation of the ideology of American exceptionalism, however, makes me uneasy. It seems to me that there are many other perfectly good countries in the world that should be as worthy of divine favor as our own.

“God bless” is also utilized as a stand-alone expression, sort of a general purpose salutation. In place of the serviceable but mundane “good bye,” some people affect the more sanctified “God bless!” upon a parting. The expression is frequently added as a codicil in black marker on those corrugated cardboard signs held by the evidently homeless on street corners. It seems vaguely ironic for the beggar to be calling on a higher power to show favor when what is really being sought in that situation is the favor of a few bucks from a passing motorist.

Really serious blessing comes in the form of the two-syllable past participle of “bless.” The Beatitudes spoken by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount are most commonly expressed orally today using the two-syllable form: “Bless-ed are the meek, for they will inherit the world.” I don’t know what evidence there is that Jesus himself warped “blessed” into a two-syllable preciousness. Personally, I have my doubts. I think He would have chosen to be more plain-spoken and less pompous about it.

The Beatitudes usefully tell us who should be blessed and why. Without this useful context, we don’t know the who or the why for the unadorned imperative, “Blessed Be.” This expression might be heard, for example, as a hushed benediction at the conclusion of a sermon or religious service. Using the two-syllable form—“bless-ed”—makes the words somehow more magical but less comprehensible. One may well wonder who Ed Bee is and why he warrants our blessing.

There is a quaintness about the benediction, but its meaning is ambiguous. It could be an admonition to the congregation to “be blessed,” but being blessed is a passive activity. Someone else must do the blessing, and the blessee has nothing to say about it. On the other hand, “blessed be” may be a kind of universal acknowledgement that all is blessed. While that may be true, if all is blessed, then blessing becomes a hollow and indistinct characteristic. If all is blessed, what is blessed?

Share This:

Hits: 678

Some other stuff for later,

  • 49
    It seemed that I had acquired way too many things. Some things were useful to me, or had been. I kept some things because I thought they might be useful later on. Things evoked memories. Some things, probably, were necessities, and some things had neither utility nor necessity but seemed…
  • 45
    BILL. Do you folks have a faith? JEANETTE. We’re spiritual but we’re not part of any organized religion. … BILL. Neil, what about you? NEIL. My parents were agnostics. BILL. But do you have any kind of belief? NEIL. I’m not sure, Bill, when you say that you believe in…
  • 44
    I consulted the oracle recently. I mean, why not? The times we find ourselves in are as incomprehensible as they are disheartening for some of us at least, and we can only have faith in Bob Dylan’s vision that the times are indeed a-changin’. My oracle of choice is the…